SC Access To Justice Weblog

Exploring ways to expand and enhance legal services to South Carolinians with low income or of modest means

12/10/09: Judge Spence

Yesterday I was honored to attend and be a speaker at the Lexington County Bar’s Annual Conference. Presenters were The Honorable James O. Spence, Master-in-Equity; Desa Ballard, Private Attorney; The Honorable Richard C. Collins, Magistrate;  The Honorable Daniel R. Eckstrom, Probate Court; and me.

The Topic?   Ethical Issues with Pro Se Litigants

Judge Spence opened the session. He noted that how judges and attorneys interact with self-represented litigants (SRLs) depends on them first making a philosophical decision. He showed film clips from The Green Mile and 300.

From The Green Mile:

Paul Edgecomb: What do you want me to do John? You want me to let you run out of here, see how far you can get?
John Coffey: Why would you do such a foolish thing?
Paul Edgecomb: On the day of my judgment, when I stand before God, and He asks me why did I kill one of his true miracles, what am I gonna say? That is was my job? My job?

From 300 we learn:

300 tells the story of the Battle of Thermopylae in 480 B.C. Persians under the rule of King Xerxes have already taken over some of the Hellenic city-states, and now threaten Sparta and Athens. King Leonidas of Sparta is left with two options: he will either have to sacrifice himself for the well-being of Sparta or watch it burn to the ground. Choosing the former, Leonidas forms an army of 300 Spartan warriors to block the narrow passage of Thermopylae where Xerxes intends to reach Hellas. On the road they meet some allies, who are shocked that the Spartans are sending such a small force. Leonidas asks the professions of the allied army, who are craftsmen and artisans. He points out that he has brought more soldiers than they.

Judge Spence also offered 3 other points for us:

  1. Mom’s Advice: Be Nice and Play Fair!
  2. Viewing Norman Rockwell’s 1961: Do Unto Others
  3. A snippet from The Byrds “Turn, Turn, Turn” aka Ecclesiastes 3:1

Takeaways?

  • We learn that as attorneys and human beings, we are each responsible for how we treat others.
  • As judges and attorneys, we are officers of the court. We are responsible for public trust in us. We gain this trust through respect, dignity and patience. We should be judicious with Summary Judgment motions.
  • We should schedule status conferences and explain standards clearly.
  • We should use Court Reporters to ensure that our words are recorded. This also reminds us that we are “on the record.”
  • SRLs are not one size fits all. They cannot be characterized with broad strokes. Instead they come in all shapes and sizes, like the Armour Hot Dog song.
  • If you are having a hard time, go back to the basics – why did you go into law? It probably wasn’t to take advantage of others. Revisit your motives.

Next installment: Desa Ballard.

-RFW

Filed under: 1, Continuing Legal Education, Court, IOLTA, Law, Legal, Legalese, South Carolina, South Carolina Access to Justice Commission, South Carolina Bar, South Carolina Court Administration, South Carolina Courts, access to justice, access to justice blog, advocacy, attorney, blog, court innovation, foreclosure, housing, indigent, poverty, public interest attorney, self-represented litigant , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

SRLs – A Start

For those of you interested in learning where to start to learn more about self-represented litigants in South Carolina, here’s my cheat sheet:

Resources

1.         Online

A.  South Carolina:

B.  National:

  • http://www.selfhelpsupport.org/ – Members include judges, clerks, court staff, legal aid advocates, bar association representatives, law school faculty, researchers, and others who work to increase access to justice.
  • http://www.srln.org/ – The Self-Represented Litigation Network brings together courts and access to justice organizations in support of innovations in services for the self represented
  • http://devlegacy.ncsc.org/WC/CourTopics/ResourceGuide.asp?topic=ProSe – The National Center for State Courts’ Self-Representation Resource Guide.
  • http://www.ajs.org/prose/home.asp – The American Judicature Society’s Pro Se Forum.
  • http://www.lri.lsc.gov/prose/prose.asp – The Pro Se Section of the Legal Services Corporation Resource Library focuses on practices to help legal services programs empower low-income clients to help themselves through pro se advocacy.
  • http://www.abanet.org/legalservices/delivery/delunbund.html – The American Bar Association’s Pro Se/Unbundling Resource Center. This site has been developed as a project of the ABA Standing Committee on the Delivery of Legal Services. It is designed as a resource to help lawyers, bar leaders, the judiciary, court administrators, scholars and the media better understand and critically analyze the issues involved in self-representation and unbundled legal services.

C.  Other States:

  • http://www.courtinfo.ca.gov/selfhelp/ – The California Courts Online Self-Help Center which helps self-represented litigants find assistance and information, work better with an attorney, and represent themselves in some legal matters.
  • http://www.legalhotlines.org/ – AARP’s Florida senior Legal Helpline Honored by State Coalition.

2.         Attachments

I’m sure there will be more to come, but this should give you a start!

And many thanks to probono.net for supporting many of these platforms.

-RFW

Filed under: 1, Court, Law, Law Related Education, Legal, Legal Clinic, Legal Documents, Legal Drafting, Legalese, Plain English, Plain Language, Right to Counsel, South Carolina, South Carolina Access to Justice Commission, South Carolina Bar Foundation, South Carolina Court Administration, South Carolina Courts, South Carolina Legal Services, South Carolina Supreme Court, access to justice, access to justice blog, attorney, blog, court innovation, indigent, law librarians, legal aid, poverty, pro bono, public interest attorney, self-represented litigant , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

October Wrap-Up SC Supreme Court News

October WrapLast month there was a lot of excitement at the South Carolina Supreme Court.

If you have a moment, take a look at these news items. Each offers perspective into the work of the Court and its endeavor to serve access to justice.

-RFW

Filed under: 1, Charleston School of Law, Court, Law, Legal, Right to Counsel, South Carolina, South Carolina Access to Justice Commission, South Carolina Court Administration, South Carolina Courts, South Carolina Supreme Court, access to justice, access to justice blog, advocacy, attorney, blog, court innovation, elderly, law librarians, law students, public interest attorney , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

No paper towels, only legal paper

This may seem like a strange title for a post, but recently I received an email from South Carolina Court Administration indicating that Clerks of Court are having to reject pleadings at a higher rate due to an increase of non-conformance with Rule 10, SCRCP.

For new attorneys and self-represented litigants, it may be a good idea to review Rule 10 of the South Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure which governs Form of Pleadings.

Here is Section (a) of Rule 10. Please note the numbered arrows correspond with bracketed numbers in the text.

(a) Caption, Name of Parties. Every pleading shall contain a caption setting forth the name of the State [1] and County[1], the name of the Court[6], the title of the action[5], the file number [4]and a designation as in Rule 7(a). In the summons and complaint the title of the action shall include the names of all parties[2][3], but in other pleadings it is sufficient to state the name of the first party on each side with an appropriate indication of other parties.

Caption with arrows

Note this entire portion is called the CAPTION.

Please note that there will not be a docket number [4] until the Clerk of Court assigns one. If you do not know your judicial circuit number, you can check the map here on the SC Courts’ website.

Now, let’s skip down to Section (d):

(d) Manner of Preparing Papers. Pleadings and other papers shall be on legal cap paper, eight and one-half by eleven inches in size. They shall be plainly written with adequate spacing between lines or typewritten with not less than one and one-half spacing between lines. Each page shall be numbered consecutively and pages shall be fastened at the top so as to read continuously. Papers in handwriting or typewriting must have a blank margin of an inch and one-half on the left. Plats, photographs, diagrams, documents, and other paper exhibits or copies thereof may be submitted in their actual size; but should be reduced if practicable to eight and one-half by eleven inches if such reduction does not impair legibility and clarity.

What’s of interest here is that even though it clearly states that PLEADINGS AND OTHER PAPERS SHALL BE ON LEGAL CAP PAPER (8 1/2 x 11), the Courts have been receiving pleadings written on paper towels, napkins and even envelopes. And according to Section (e), the Clerks can refuse to file pleadings or papers that are not prepared according to this rule.

Skip down to Section (e):

(e) Filing Refused. The clerk of the court shall not file any pleadings or other papers not prepared in accordance with this rule; except plats, photographs, diagrams, documents, and other paper exhibits as provided in paragraph 10(c).

Please read through the rules before filing documents and make sure you’re in compliance with the rules. If not, the result could be costly to litigants while slowing the efforts of judges to dispense justice.

And if you are a self-represented litigant and are not sure what to do, you may wish to consult an attorney to ensure that you are not giving up your legal rights.

-RFW

Filed under: 1, Court, Law, Legal, Legal Clinic, Legal Documents, Legal Drafting, Legalese, Plain English, Plain Language, Readability, South Carolina, South Carolina Access to Justice Commission, South Carolina Court Administration, South Carolina Courts, access to justice, access to justice blog, attorney, blog, law librarians, legal aid, poverty, self-represented litigant , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

SC ATJ attends the SC Clerk of Court Conference 10.1.09

Last Thursday I had the privilege of speaking at the South Carolina Clerk of Court Conference at the Hilton Garden Inn in Aiken, SC. My presentation was an update of access to justice.

The presentation was met with enthusiasm and discussion continued even past the presentation. Luckily, at the last minute, I was able to incorporate a little of the updated report from LSCDOCUMENTING THE JUSTICE GAP IN AMERICA.

Here’s the presentation:

Clerks fall conf 10.1.09

And here are some of the photos:

CIMG5009

CIMG5010

CIMG5011

CIMG5012

CIMG5013

CIMG5014

CIMG5016

CIMG5019

CIMG5017CIMG5018

CIMG5020

CIMG5021

CIMG5023

CIMG5029

CIMG5031

CIMG5032

CIMG5033

CIMG5034

CIMG5035

CIMG5038

Thanks to Katie Staden from the SC Bar who accompanied me and took some of the photos when I was speaking!

-RFW

Filed under: 1, Court, IOLTA, LEP, Law, Law Related Education, Legal, Legal Clinic, Legal Documents, Legal Drafting, Limited English Proficiency, Plain English, Plain Language, Right to Counsel, South Carolina, South Carolina Access to Justice Commission, South Carolina Bar, South Carolina Court Administration, South Carolina Courts, access to justice, access to justice blog, advocacy, attorney, blog, indigent, law librarians, law students, legal aid, poverty, pro bono, public interest attorney , , , , , , , , , ,

COMING SOON to a town near you: Celebrate Pro Bono

LOUD & CLEAR: PRO BONO ROCKS
LOUD & CLEAR: PRO BONO ROCKS

At the end of October, across the nation, attorneys will join together to provide Pro Bono services as part of the American Bar Association’s CELEBRATE PRO BONO WEEK (October 25-31, 2009).

Celebrate Pro Bono 2009 image badge small

Mark your calendars. The South Carolina Access to Justice Commission will be highlighting some of the featured events, programs or pro bono attorneys on the blog.

If  you have a story to share and would like to be a guest blogger, please email me.

-RFW

Filed under: 1, Ask-A-Lawyer, Charleston Pro Bono Legal Services, Charleston School of Law, Law, Law Related Education, Legal, Legal Clinic, Legal Documents, Legal Drafting, Legalese, Right to Counsel, South Carolina, South Carolina Access to Justice Commission, South Carolina Bar, South Carolina Bar Foundation, South Carolina Bar Pro Bono Program, South Carolina Court Administration, South Carolina Courts, South Carolina Legal Services, South Carolina Supreme Court, USC School of Law, access to justice, access to justice blog, attorney, blog, homeless, indigent, law librarians, law students, legal aid, poverty, pro bono, public interest attorney, self-represented litigant , , , , ,

SC Courts Website: Noteworthy!

In perusing the 2009 Edition of Future Trends published by the National Center for State Courts (NCSC), I saw that the South Carolina Courts website was featured prominently as an example of user-friendly design.

This is exciting because it highlights the SC Court’s interest in serving the general public and making information easy to find.  And the following Excerpt indicates why the site is so successful:

The South Carolina Judicial Department’s Web team compiled over
a year’s worth of e-mailed requests from court staff, the legal community,
and the public to help design the site’s e-mail notification system, through
which Web visitors can sign up to receive opinions, orders, rules, forms,
court news, and more.

The report also contains information about the rising number of self-represented litigants within the nation’s court system. While South Carolina has been working to address this area with our access to justice SRL efforts, SRLs are exponentially increasing their presence in the courts.

If you are interested in court trends in SC and around the USA, I would definitely recommend taking a few minutes to check out the recent NCSC report.

Special Thanks to technola for pointing us toward the report.

-RFW

Filed under: 1, Court, Law, Legal, Legal Documents, Legal Drafting, Legalese, Plain English, Plain Language, Readability, South Carolina, South Carolina Access to Justice Commission, South Carolina Court Administration, South Carolina Courts, South Carolina Supreme Court, access to justice, access to justice blog, blog, court innovation, poverty, self-represented litigant, technola , , , , , , , , , , ,

August 2009 E-Newsletter

The August 2009 E-Newsletter is now available online.

SCATJC August 2009 E-Newsletter

-RFW

Filed under: Court, Law, Legal, SC Appleseed Legal Justice Center, SC Bar, South Carolina, South Carolina Access to Justice Commission, South Carolina Bar, South Carolina Bar Foundation, South Carolina Bar Pro Bono Program, South Carolina Court Administration, South Carolina Courts, South Carolina Legal Services, South Carolina Supreme Court, access to justice, access to justice blog, blog, court innovation, legal aid, self-represented litigant , , ,

Listening Matters

This has been an interesting day.

This morning I attended a part of the SC Judicial Conference. The SC Access to Justice Commission’s website was featured along with some special projects with divisions of the SC Courts, especially two projects for Self-Represented Litigants.

Afterward I returned to the office to begin other work, especially that involving increasing pro bono service by the private bar. And if you’re not familiar with Rule 608 which some private bar members attribute as the primary barrier to increased pro bono service in South Carolina, click here.

At any rate, I entered a discussion of pro bono. In the midst of an enthusiastic discussion, one of the three participants advocated a position.  Immediately I (re)entered the discussion and proceeded to reject this concept. At the end of my pontification, I sat back in my chair, feeling satisfied that my response had enlightened both participants. Instead, the person who had originally advocated the position, re-stated the position. I turned to both participants and said “oh, you said [legal term].” Both nodded in agreement. At that, I apologized and agreed with the original position.

Please note:

  • Listening is courteous.

  • Listening is efficient.

  • Listening Matters.

-RFW

Filed under: 1, Court, Law, Legal, Right to Counsel, Rule of Law, SC Bar, South Carolina, South Carolina Access to Justice Commission, South Carolina Bar, South Carolina Bar Pro Bono Program, South Carolina Court Administration, South Carolina Courts, South Carolina Supreme Court, access to justice, access to justice blog, advocacy, attorney, blog, court innovation, indigent, legal aid, poverty, pro bono, public interest attorney, self-represented litigant , , , , , , ,

Answering FAQs: It’s Harder than You Think!

FAQ

FAQ

The SC Access to Justice Commission has been working with the Clerk of Court Work Group to develop answers to Frequently Asked Questions or FAQs. These FAQs have taken considerably more time to complete than I had originally thought.

Why?

Because the Clerks, Court Administration and the Commission want to make certain that the information we provide to the public is

  1. accurate,
  2. complete, and
  3. helpful.

In order to assure accuracy, we have reviewed the South Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure (SCRCP), the South Carolina Code as well as information provided by other states. Additionally, to ensure that the information is complete, we have researched case law and publications, such as “Service of Process in South Carolina” by John S. Nichols and published by the SC Bar.

One other factor that is extremely important to the Clerks, Court Administration and the Commission is that the information is provided in an easy-to-read format and that it is easily understandable. In other words, we want them to be written in PLAIN LANGUAGE.

This week the Commission is submitting the Questions and Answers to the Circuit Court and Family Court Advisory Committees where they will provide another level of scrutiny to ensure that the answers are accurate, complete and helpful.

When the FAQs with their model answers are complete, they will be available online. Be stay tuned for updates.

We’re looking forward to sharing the FAQs and answers with you!

-RFW

Filed under: 1, Court, LEP, Law, Legal, Legal Documents, Legal Drafting, Legalese, Limited English Proficiency, Plain English, Plain Language, Readability, SC Bar, South Carolina, South Carolina Access to Justice Commission, South Carolina Bar, South Carolina Court Administration, South Carolina Courts, access to justice, access to justice blog, attorney, blog, court innovation, legal aid, self-represented litigant , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Blog Stats

  • 29,590

DISCLAIMER

This Blog is for informational purposes ONLY. FOR LEGAL ADVICE, CONTACT A LICENSED ATTORNEY IN YOUR STATE.

Please consider the environment before printing this post!

Twitter Updates

TwitterCounter for @scatj
Technorati blog directory

Add This Button

Law & Legal Blogs - Blog Catalog Blog Directory

To further Access to Justice in SC, donate to the SC Bar Foundation

To donate online, please visit
Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape

RSS SC Bar News

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.