Most of us begin to fashion a response to the question when we’re asked “Why do YOU want to go to law school?” And if you’re surrounded by friends who are not in the legal profession, you may hear the follow-up “You’re such a nice person. Why do you want to change?”
I replied “I want to help people.” And you know what? Many attorneys in the public interest sector answered similarly.
You may not generally think of attorneys as helpful, but take a few moments to ponder “when do I or would I use an attorney?”
- When a family member dies. Hopefully they’ve drafted a will, but either way, we often turn to an attorney to help us through the probate process.
- When we go through a divorce. Sure there are divorce forms and packets available online (and in South Carolina, there are court-approved forms online), but when we think about it, isn’t it prudent to let someone who is not emotionally involved in our marriage take a look and advise us about the long-term effects of the dissolution?
- When we buy or sell a house. This may not seem like an emotional time, but for many it is. This is one of the largest purchases (ok, probably the largest) we will ever make. We commit to this home for the next 30 years or so. Sounds like a good time to have an attorney research the title and make sure we’re paying for what is rightfully ours.
- When we are accused of a crime. I know I want someone well-versed in criminal law to fight for my freedom.
In other words, we use the knowledge and services of attorneys when we have big events in our lives – either when something bad has happened or may happen. To help us.
And I became an attorney to do just that – help people.
-RFW









Elkins Family Law Task Force Recommendations Open for Comment
8 10 2009On October 2, 2009, the Elkins Family Law Task Force released its draft recommendations for ways to improve access to justice in the California Family Court system.
The public comment period is October 1, 2009, through December 4, 2009.
The draft recommendations and an online comment form are available at www.courtinfo.ca.gov/jc/tflists/elkins.htm.
In addition, the task force will hold two public hearings to receive in-person comments on the draft recommendations. The public hearings will be held on Thursday, October 22 in San Francisco, and on Tuesday, October 27 in Los Angeles. For information and to sign up to participate in the public hearings, go to www.courtinfo.ca.gov/jc/tflists/elkins.htm.
To learn more about the Task Force, view the FACT SHEET.
It’s evident from the List of Topics (below) that the Task Force worked hard to review the entire system:
1. Right to Present Live Testimony at Hearings
2. Expanding Legal Representation and Providing a Continuum of Legal Services
3. Caseflow Management
4. Providing Clear Guidance Through Rules of Court
5. Children’s Voices
6. Domestic Violence
7. Enhancing Safety
8. Contested Child Custody
9. Minor’s Counsel
10. Scheduling of Trials and Long-Cause Hearings
11. Litigant Education
12. Expanding Services to Assist Litigants in Resolving Their Cases
13. Streamlining Family Law Forms and Procedures
14. Enhancing Mechanisms to Handle Perjury
15. Standardize Default and Uncontested Process Statewide
16. Interpreters
17. Public Information and Outreach
18. Judicial Branch Education
19. Family Law Research Agenda
20. Court Facilities
21. Leadership, Accountability, and Resources
The SC Access to Justice Commission will continue to follow the project and update you as it develops.
-RFW
Comments : Leave a Comment »
Tags: California Courts, California Family Court system, Draft Recommendations, Elkins Family Law Task Force, Public Comment, public hearings
Categories : 1, access to justice, access to justice blog, advocacy, attorney, blog, children, Civil Gideon, Court, court innovation, divorce, domestic violence, elderly, foster parents, indigent, Law, law librarians, law students, Legal, legal aid, Legal Documents, Legal Drafting, Legalese, LEP, Limited English Proficiency, Plain English, Plain Language, poverty, poverty guidelines, public interest attorney, Readability, Right to Counsel, Rule of Law, self-represented litigant, South Carolina Access to Justice Commission